|
Syllabus by the Ohio Ethics Commission:
* * * * * * Your request for an advisory opinion asks whether a member of the Board of Tax Appeals of the State of Ohio, appointed pursuant to Section 5703.03 of the Revised Code, who is also engaged by the Ohio Building Authority as an attorney, violates Section 102.04 (A) of the Revised Code. You state that you have been employed as an attorney for the Ohio Building Authority, created pursuant to Sections 152.01 et seq of the Revised Code, and that you are an independent contractor in that capacity. You further state that you represent no private clients' interests before any board, department, commission, or agency of the state of Ohio. The first issue is whether you as a member of the Board of Tax Appeals are a person who has been "appointed to an office of . . . any . . . board . . . of the state, . . ." and thus fall within the purview of Section 102.04 (A) of the Revised Code. The Board of Tax Appeals is created by Section 5703.01 of the Revised Code:
Section 5703.03 provides for the appointment of members of the Board of Tax Appeals:
The powers and duties of the Board of Tax Appeals are set forth in Section 5703.02 of the Revised Code:
Section 5703.04 of the Revised Code sets forth additional powers, duties and immunities of the Board of Tax Appeals and the tax commissioner:
The Ohio Ethics Commission in Advisory Opinion No. 75-004, applied certain tests to determine if a member of a board is "appointed to an office." They were (1) was he appointed; (2) does he have a title; (3) does he exercise functions of government concerning the public; (4) is he not subject to a contract of employment; (5) does he exercise sovereign power. From the above cited statutes, it is evident that a member of the Board of Tax Appeals is (1) appointed, (2) does have a title of member of the Board of Tax Appeals, (3) does exercise functions of government concerning the public, and (4) is not subject to a contract of employment. Furthermore, it is apparent from a review of the powers, duties and immunities of the Board of Tax Appeals that the members exercise sovereign power. The duties and powers which they exercise can be described as "not merely clerical but involve some discretionary, decision-making qualities" and, moreover, they are entrusted to the members of the Board of Tax Appeals by a statute and thus demonstrate an exercise of "sovereign power" as that term is described in Ohio Ethics Commission Advisory Opinion No. 75-004. A member of the Board of Tax Appeals of the state of Ohio is a person who is "appointed to an office of . . . any . . . board . . . of the state" for purposes of Section 102.04 (A) of the Revised Code. Therefore, a member of the Board of Tax Appeals is prohibited from receiving or agreeing to receive compensation, other than from the agency with which he serves, for services rendered or to be rendered by him personally, in any case, proceeding, application, or other matter which is before the General Assembly, or any department, division, institution, instrumentality, board, commission or bureau of the state, excluding the courts. The next issue, therefore, is whether a member of the Board of Tax Appeals can receive compensation as an attorney engaged under separate contract or as an employee of another state agency. As set out in Ohio Ethics Commission, Advisory Opinion No. 75-011, an independent contractor with a state agency is not within the purview of Section 102.04 (A) of the Revised Code since "employed by" as used in that section does not include independent contractors. Thus, if you are an independent contractor, you would not be included, by virtue of serving in that capacity, within the purview of Section 102.04 (A) of the Revised Code. Ohio Ethics Commission Advisory opinion No. 75-010 concluded that the phrase "other than from the agency with which he serves" does not prohibit a member of the Board of Building Standards, who is an architect, from receiving compensation from more than one state agency for services personally rendered. The rationale was that "agency" as used in that phrase may be read in the plural, as well as the singular. Therefore, compensation received from more than one state agency is not prohibited. Thus, it is not a violation of Section 102.04 (A) of the Revised Code, for a member of the Board of Tax Appeals to receive compensation as an attorney engaged by another agency of the state as counsel, either as an independent contractor for that agency, or as an employee of the agency. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Ohio Ethics Commission, and you are so advised that a member of the Board of Tax Appeals of the State of Ohio is not prohibited by Section 102.04 (A) of the Revised Code from receiving compensation from other state agencies for services rendered or to be rendered by him. OHIO ETHICS COMMISSION |
|||||
|
by the Ohio Ethics Commission, of the search engine or its products or services. |
|||||
|
|