|
Syllabus by the Ohio Ethics Commission:
* * * * * * Your request for an advisory opinion asks whether an attorney appointed to a county public defender commission would be in violation of Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code if he practices before other agencies of the same county. Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code states:
The issue is whether a person appointed to a newly created county public defender commission would be "appointed to an office of . . . a county" for purposes of Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code. The Ohio Ethics Commission in Advisory Opinion No. 75-004, used several tests to determine whether a person has been appointed to an "office" for purposes of Section 102.04 (A) of the Revised Code: (1) was he appointed; (2) does he have a title; (3) does he exercise functions of government concerning the public; (4) is he not subject to a contract of employment; and, (5) does he exercise sovereign power. Sovereign power is a concept meant to imply the exercise of a duty entrusted to one by virtue of statute or some public authority. Those duties are not merely clerical but involve some discretionary, decision-making qualities." That Advisory Opinion held that finding facts, assisting in the formulation of plans and the making of recommendations was not an exercise of sovereign power. Ohio Ethics Commission Advisory Opinion No. 75-007 applied these same tests to determine "offices" which fall within the purview of Division (B) of Section 102.04 of the Revised Code. In order to apply these tests to the position of member of a county public defender commission it is necessary to examine the statute establishing the commission. Pursuant to Section 120.13 of the Revised Code the county commissioners may establish a county public defender commission:
Section 120.14 of the Revised Code sets out the powers and duties of the commission:
From the above cited Sections, it is clear that members of a county public defender commission meet the tests established to determine if persons are "appointed to an office," since they: (1) are appointed by the County Commissioners; (2) have a title of member of the county public defender commission; (3) exercise a function of government concerning the public -- the establishment and operation of the public defender service for indigents; and (4) are not subject to a contract of employment, but rather serve a specific term of office. The sovereign power test is met since the Constitutional guarantee to counsel established by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and reaffirmed in Article I, Section 10 of the Ohio Constitution has been interpreted to require government to provide legal counsel to indigents charged with violations of law. Thus, the duty of providing legal counsel to indigents is the exercise of sovereign power delegated by Chapter 120 of the Revised Code to the public defender commissions. Therefore, the public defender commission meets the fifth test of exercising a sovereign power. The position of member of a county public defender commission meets all five tests established to determine whether the members are appointed to "an office" for purposes of Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code, and therefore, the members are appointed to "an office." In order to determine if the office of member of a county public defender commission is a county office, it is necessary to examine the source and territorial jurisdiction of the commission's power and authority. A review of Sections 120.13 and 120.14 of the Revised Code discloses that county public defender commissioners derive their authority by virtue of their appointment to office by elected county officials -- the county commissioners and a judge of the court of common pleas of the county in which they serve. The territorial jurisdiction of the county public defender commission is limited to the boundaries of the county which creates the commission and whose elected officials appoint the members. Further, Section 120.18 of the Revised Code provides that the expenses of the county public defender's office shall be audited and approved by the county commissioners and the county auditor and that except for a fifty per cent reimbursement by the state, the county is responsible for funding the county public defender's office through county funds, gifts, contracts or grants. Thus, the county public defender commission operates within the structure of and under the supervision of the county government. Therefore, a member of the county public defender commission is a "person . . . appointed to an office of . . . a county" (emphasis added) for purposes of Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Ohio Ethics Commission, and you are so advised, that a member of a county public defender commission is appointed to a county office and, therefore, within the purview of Section 102.04 (B) of the Revised Code and thus is prohibited from receiving or agreeing to receive, directly or indirectly, compensation, other than from the agency with which he serves, for any service rendered or to be rendered by him personally in any case, proceeding, application, or other matter which is before any agency, excluding the courts, of the county of which he is an officer. OHIO ETHICS COMMISSION |
|||||
|
by the Ohio Ethics Commission, of the search engine or its products or services. |
|||||
|
|