|
Syllabus by the Ohio Ethics Commission:
* * * * * * Your request for an advisory opinion asks whether an engineer, who is a member of the state Board of Building Appeals, would violate the ethics law while serving on that Board, if he simultaneously serves as a part-time consultant to a city. By way of history, you state that you are a member of the Ohio Board of Building Appeals and City Engineer for a city. You state further that as city engineer you serve as a part-time consultant to the city council and approve all development plans for conformance with city engineering regulations for streets and storm drainage. You further relate that you do not review plans of buildings or houses and, in fact, the city which you serve as engineer has another engineer who serves as the Building Official and Plan Reviewer. The question you have directed to the Ohio Ethics Commission falls within the purview of Division (A) of Section 102.04 of the Revised Code, since you have been "appointed to an office of . . . a board . . . of the state." Section 3781.19 of the Revised Code establishes the Board of Building Appeals:
The question is whether you as a "member" of a statutorily created state board fall within the purview of Division (A) of Section 102.02 of the Revised Code. Reference is made to the Ohio Ethics Commission Advisory Opinion No. 74-007 which discusses the issue of whether "members" of a board are officers within the meaning of Section 102.04 of the Revised Code. That opinion sets forth various tests which have arisen from Supreme Court decisions. "Where an individual has been appointed or elected in a manner described by law, or has a title given him by law, or exercises functions of government concerning public, assigned to him," he holds office. State v. Brennan, 49 Ohio St. 33, (1892). "The term must be defined, affixed and certain and not arising out of a mere contract of employment." Muskingum County Democratic Committee v. Burrier, 31 Ohio Ops. 570 (1945.) Therefore, some of the tests as to whether or not a "member" is an "officer," are (1) was he appointed, (2) does he have a title, (3) does he exercise functions of government concerning the public, and (4) is he subject to a contract of employment. It should be emphasized that the Ohio Ethics Commission considers these among some of the tests that are applied to determine whether members of organizational units of a governmental entity are officers of that entity. No one indiciam is determinant all the time. Generally, there exists a combination of these factors. Sometimes the inclusion of others not listed, is the basis for the determination that one "holds an office." From Section 3781.19 above, it becomes evident that you serve by appointment, you have a title as the member of the Board of Building Appeals, that you exercise functions of government concerning the public, that you are not serving by virtue of a contract and that your term is defined, affixed and certain. It is the determination of the Ohio Ethics Commission, therefore, that you are an officer of the state of Ohio. Thus, as one who holds an office of the state of Ohio, you are prohibited by Division (A) of Section 102.04 of the Revised Code from receiving or agreeing to receive compensation, directly or indirectly, other than from the agency with which you serve, for services rendered by you personally in a case, proceeding, application or other matter which is before the General Assembly or any department, division, institution, instrumentality, board, commission or bureau of the state, excluding the courts. The position you hold with the city as the city engineer falls within the purview of Division (B) of Section 102.04 of the Revised Code:
You do not state in your request whether you were elected, appointed or employed by the city, however, the Ohio Ethics Commission assumes that you fall within one of those categories. Thus, as city engineer for a city, you are prohibited by Division (B) of Section 102.04 of the Revised Code from receiving or agreeing to receive compensation, directly or indirectly, other than from the agency of the municipal corporation with which you serve for services personally rendered by you in any case, proceeding, application or other matter which is before any agency of that municipal corporation. Reference is made to Ohio Ethics Commission Advisory Opinion No. 74-001, wherein Section 102.04 of the Revised Code is analyzed:
The intent of the legislature, as described in the above cited material, was to prohibit activity within the entity with which one serves. Since your positions as member of the Ohio Board of Building Appeals and as a city engineer are with different entities, Section 102.04 of the Revised Code, per se, does not prohibit you from simultaneously holding those positions. The Ohio Attorney General offers opinions on the comparability of various offices. Nothing contained herein should serve to grant an imprimatur to the holding of two positions when an opinion of the Attorney General has been issued to the contrary or with respect to laws other than Chapter 102 of the Revised Code. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Ohio Ethics Commission, and you are so advised, that it is not a violation of Section 102.04 of the Revised Code, per se, for a person to serve as a member of the Board of Building Appeals of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of Ohio and as City Engineer for a city.
THE OHIO ETHICS COMMISSION
|
|||||
|
by the Ohio Ethics Commission, of the search engine or its products or services. |
|||||
|
|